• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Ron McLeod
  • Paul Clapham
  • Liutauras Vilda
Sheriffs:
  • paul wheaton
  • Rob Spoor
  • Devaka Cooray
Saloon Keepers:
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
  • Frits Walraven
  • Tim Moores
Bartenders:
  • Mikalai Zaikin

Synchronized block Vs Concurrent Lock

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 1491
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Which gives best performance Synchronized block / Concurrent Lock ?
 
Bartender
Posts: 10780
71
Hibernate Eclipse IDE Ubuntu
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

kri shan wrote:Which gives best performance Synchronized block / Concurrent Lock ?


In theory, the latter is supposed to be more scalable, and does allow a bit more flexibility; but it comes at the expense of more code and thus more chances for "getting it wrong" and/or making things less readable.

Unless you're actually writing a critical multi-tasking system, I'd suggest you only use the latter if you can prove that it makes sense. And that means LOTS of testing of both forms.

Winston
 
We cannot change unless we survive, but we will not survive unless we change. Evolving tiny ad:
a bit of art, as a gift, the permaculture playing cards
https://gardener-gift.com
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic