SCJP 1.2, OCP 9i DBA, SCWCD 1.3, SCJP 1.4 (SAI), SCJD 1.4, SCWCD 1.4 (Beta), ICED (IBM 287, IBM 484, IBM 486), SCMAD 1.0 (Beta), SCBCD 1.3, ICSD (IBM 288), ICDBA (IBM 700, IBM 701), SCDJWS, ICSD (IBM 348), OCP 10g DBA (Beta), SCJP 5.0 (Beta), SCJA 1.0 (Beta), MCP(70-270), SCBCD 5.0 (Beta), SCJP 6.0, SCEA for JEE5 (in progress)
By analysing your options and making a decision. It's no different from buying a car in that sense. You have the option to trust others' suggestions ("buy a Ford", "buy a Toyota", "use Struts", "use WebWork", etc.) or make the decision based on your own analysis (reading the car's technical specifications, reading the MVC framework's feature list, taking the car for a test drive, prototyping an MVC framework, etc.).Originally posted by Pradeep Bhat:
If there are more than one framework how to select the right one?
No, the Sun specifications (JSRs) will not become irrelevant just because someone creates an open source project providing similar (or even clearly better) functionality. Standards will have power in the eyes of businesses for decades to come, I believe.Originally posted by Pradeep Bhat:
Also, open framework will mean that Sun spec will no longer be relevent ?
Originally posted by Pradeep Bhat:
Are all orgainzations open to open-source?
Author of Test Driven (2007) and Effective Unit Testing (2013) [Blog] [HowToAskQuestionsOnJavaRanch]
Originally posted by Pradeep Bhat:
While it may be good to have many open source frame work what my concern is selecting the best one for a task.
If there are more than one framework how to select the right one? Also, open framework will mean that Sun spec will no longer be relevent ?
Are all orgainzations open to open-source? Lasse, what is your opinion?
Originally posted by Pradeep Bhat:
The Tapestry home page states it an alternative to JSP scripting.
Regards
Mcgill
Originally posted by Mcgill smith:
These days it seems Velocity is taking over Jsp.
Author of Test Driven (2007) and Effective Unit Testing (2013) [Blog] [HowToAskQuestionsOnJavaRanch]
These days it seems Velocity is taking over Jsp.
SCJP 1.2, OCP 9i DBA, SCWCD 1.3, SCJP 1.4 (SAI), SCJD 1.4, SCWCD 1.4 (Beta), ICED (IBM 287, IBM 484, IBM 486), SCMAD 1.0 (Beta), SCBCD 1.3, ICSD (IBM 288), ICDBA (IBM 700, IBM 701), SCDJWS, ICSD (IBM 348), OCP 10g DBA (Beta), SCJP 5.0 (Beta), SCJA 1.0 (Beta), MCP(70-270), SCBCD 5.0 (Beta), SCJP 6.0, SCEA for JEE5 (in progress)
--<br />Howard M. Lewis Ship<br />Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant<br />Creator, Jakarta Tapestry<br />Creator, Jakarta HiveMind<br /><a href="http://howardlewisship.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://howardlewisship.com</a>
Originally posted by Howard Lewis Shp:
Tapestry has some significant edges over the other major frameworks, including JSF.
Tapestry is built upon four principals: Simplicity, Efficiency, Consistency and Feedback.
.................
Co-author of SCMAD Exam Guide, Author of JMADPlus
SCJP1.2, CCNA, SCWCD1.4, SCBCD1.3, SCMAD1.0, SCJA1.0, SCJP6.0
Originally posted by Pradeep Bhat:
I think it is required so that a company does not get caught is unforeseen legal issues. My project is going through the process.
--<br />Howard M. Lewis Ship<br />Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant<br />Creator, Jakarta Tapestry<br />Creator, Jakarta HiveMind<br /><a href="http://howardlewisship.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://howardlewisship.com</a>
Regards
Mcgill
Originally posted by Pradeep Bhat:
On a second thought, I feel that Tapestry evolving slowly is a good thing. When EJB came into J2EE, companies started using it without bothering if was really required. EJB 3.0 plans to use a light weight model. So I think Tapestry would have matured enough to be used widely.