rottscha rotti

Greenhorn
+ Follow
since Jan 18, 2005
Merit badge: grant badges
For More
Cows and Likes
Cows
Total received
0
In last 30 days
0
Total given
0
Likes
Total received
0
Received in last 30 days
0
Total given
0
Given in last 30 days
0
Forums and Threads
Scavenger Hunt
expand Ranch Hand Scavenger Hunt
expand Greenhorn Scavenger Hunt

Recent posts by rottscha rotti

Hi,
why do you focus on a framework like struts? Use the ModelViewController design pattern which combines 2 or 3 J2EE basic disign patterns (front controller ...) and explain how it fits into your architecture.

rottscha rabbit
Hi,
I'll also use the MCV pattern but not a concrete Implementation of it!! I only mention one example of a possible MVC in my assumtions. MVC is still one of the best paradigms for the webtier. Isn't it

I also assume that an existing framework will be used for accessing the FrequentFlyerMileage system btu I don't force a concrete Impl.
Oh yes, the TravelAgent does something additional to the customer:

He must be able to act in his role i.e. customer tells the travel agent his username and the agent needs not to login but to act in the role of this login and verify that the username exists and matches some personal data of that account.

Another reason is that FBN recommended the best possible performance for travelagents and a swing client has a better performance than a WebGUI.

Any thoughts about that

rottscharabbit
Don't forget to check that the user is logged in.
(See precondition of usecase)

rottscha
Hi SCEAs,
how do you handle the requirement that a travel agent must be able to act in the role of a customer i.e. he/she must use a fast thick client application and prapare an itinerary, pay for it ... but in the role (in the name) of a customer that has called the travel agency.

Any ideas

rottscha rabbit
Thanks a lot. I can concentrate better now on part II.
Hi again,
I think it is clear mentioned that the respone contains somehow the info
"authorised" or "not authorised". But the format is not clear because Transmaster says: "The response would look something like:....."

I will make the assumtion that the format is the same as mentioned in the spec .
Hi,
You neen an answer "authorised" or "not authorised" from TransMaster very quick. How should you use asynchronous messaging then?
Hi all,
I am curious about what are the contents of part III of the exam.

Does it have anything to do with part II or part I
Hi,
I have no problems with the JPG exports of Jude.

Another question: In which case do you add a return message in your sequece diags?
Why are flight/equipment/seats readonly Where does this info come from? The old database will be replaced by a new one

rottscha rabbit
Hi Annick,



Have fun ...
Hi all,
in the prepareItinerary usecase what is meant by "less than selected" in the fourth paragraph of the basic flow?

Thanks - rottscha rabbit
Hi,
I have also Problems with the combination of the two workflows.
Look at https://coderanch.com/t/153629/java-Architect-SCEA/certification/change-Itinerary

I think the forms of the prepare usecase could be reused, but its businesslogic has to check wether there had been one or more segments deleted. In that case the behaviour and the Surface has be be a little diffrent from the "standard" prepare itinerary usecase.

rr
Hi all,
from the ergonomical point of view it would make more sence to log in (and create a profile before) when the itinerary is complete because you can look at the offerings of FBN before beeing a member be logged in.

I think the main thing is that you show that you have noticed the inconsistence in the usecase, document it and choose a solution that would be the best for FBN and the customer.

any comments? - rr