Since no-one else has replied to this, I'll point out that:
XDoclet 1.2.* works fine, and there are many examples around of its use. But then if you want to use XDoc2 for some reason, just ignore me
You might have better luck with this query in the J2EE/EJB forum.
From my relatively small amount of work with ejbdoclet/wseedoclet, I came to the conclusion that if I had to use it again, I had a choice: I could either buy a decent book, or go raving mad - I found the documentation to be fairly sparse for non-trivial things, and guessing/Googling was thoroughly frustrating.
One more thing, are there no examples included yet in version 2? Version 1.2 contains some extensive examples for EJBs.
-Tim [ July 21, 2005: Message edited by: Tim West ]
posted 14 years ago
I just had a look at the XDoclet 2 website, and from the EJB perspective, some things are either missing, or just reorganised so that I didn't find them immediately.
In particular, tag for each app server are not listed anywhere (@weblogic, @jboss, etc). If these really aren't present in version 2, I'd strongly advise sticking with version 1.2.*.
I wrote some documentation in general for XDoclet 2 - mylast project was'nt too hectic Does somebody care to review?..let me know. Its not complete yet for I got pulled into another project with stricter deadlines. But its almost there. But then let me point out upfront that English is'nt my native tounge so you might run into occasional incoherent sentences ..may be you can fix them !
posted 14 years ago
Originally posted by Karthik Guru: I wrote some documentation in general for XDoclet 2 - mylast project was'nt too hectic Does somebody care to review?..let me know.
I would love to take a look at it. I'm a student whith very little experience on how to develop the so called 'real world applications', so that would be more than welcome.
Don't worry about the english grammar as you may noticed it isn't my native language also.
@Tim West - Currently using xdoclet 1.2 and everthing works fine, the reason for using the version 2 is pure experimental, thanks for the reply. I tought that xdoclet was a build tool, so sorry if I posted on the wrong forum.
posted 14 years ago
I know its a little late. But i got caught up with things at work. its here. Please do let me know if you found it to be useful. [ October 10, 2005: Message edited by: Karthik Guru ]
I would like to point to the following blog from Craig Walls(he is the author of xdoclet in action). He has some interesting points about the necessity of using Xdoclet in the projects that use new development approached(minimal Entity bean usage etc).
Yes with advent of annotations , the importance of XDoclet has receeded. But it appears that annotations is still not in widespread use and it remains to be seen what developers feel about it. Either way there are still other projects - webwork, spring, jsf (and struts!) that still rely on XML config files. As for move to XDoclet2, the design is way better than XDoclet1.2 and if there is a *need* for code generation then I would use X2 anyday because of its simplicity. Btw they moved the docs to the main page. [ October 18, 2005: Message edited by: Karthik Guru ]
Originally posted by Pradip Bhat: Dont you think they could use custom annotations ?
oh yes. I never said that they can't.
Either way there are still other projects - webwork, spring, jsf (and struts!) that still rely on XML config files
But what remains to be seen if they have it in their roadmap. They have to build the infrastructure to support annotated artifcats. I ran into a blurb by rod johnson for eg where he gives an impression that he is not completely enamoured by annotations like say ejb3. I dont seem to recollect the link though. [ October 19, 2005: Message edited by: Karthik Guru ]
Could you hold this puppy for a sec? I need to adjust this tiny ad: