Win a copy of AWS Security this week in the Cloud/Virtualization forum!
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Paul Clapham
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Junilu Lacar
  • Henry Wong
Sheriffs:
  • Ron McLeod
  • Devaka Cooray
  • Tim Cooke
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Moores
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Frits Walraven
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
Bartenders:
  • Piet Souris
  • salvin francis
  • fred rosenberger

Regarding the naming rule

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 218
VI Editor Ruby Ubuntu
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Just a Meaningless Drivel,
I was wondering about the fairness of the naming rule.
Since this is a Java website, does people aware that
in Indonesia ( which own Java Island ) a lot of the people
only has 1 (one) name, but some of the Javanese royalty
might have like 7-10 names ( real names, no royalty title
add on ).
How is the naming rule can be fair to those people or people
from other country/culture that does not support First Name and
Last Name system.
Another example: Chinese usually have 3 names.
How can we account for that?
-Ryo
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 782
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Sorry, but all the rules are tailored for us Americans. Everyone must assimiliate to our rules. Resistance is futile.
 
mister krabs
Posts: 13974
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

I was wondering about the fairness of the naming rule.

Fairness? I don't think it is an issue of fairness... more likely convenience. What's the big deal about making up a second name? Use your town or your dad's name. And most Americans have three names (a middle name) but we just don't use it. It seems to me that figuring out a way to abide by the standard is a trivial non-issue.
 
Wanderer
Posts: 18671
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
So what you're saying is, for some classes in Java the Name constructor is private and the Name is implemented as a singleton?
I can see that our rules may seem a bit strange to people from some cultures, but it does seem to be pretty simple to add something to a name to make it comply. This would be necessary anyway for some people - let's say the most common name in Java is John. (Obviously not, but I have no idea what a good choice would be.) What happens when the second person named John decides to register for JavaRanch? He has to modify his name, because "John" is already taken. And he may justly wonder why the first person is entitled to be the one and only "John" just because he got there first. Meanwhile the original John may regret having chosen such a simple name, because while he originally thought his name was unique, on the internet it turns out that's just not true, and now people regularly confuse him with the other 257 Johns on the group. Better I think to encourage disambiguation from the beginning.
Note that it's perfectly OK to have a JavaRanch name with more than two parts. We only object if there are fewer than two.
 
Good heavens! What have you done! Here, try to fix it with this tiny ad:
Devious Experiments for a Truly Passive Greenhouse!
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/paulwheaton/greenhouse-1
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic