My Thoughts : http://passion4java.blogspot.com
Try not to become a man of success but rather to become a man of value.
My Thoughts : http://passion4java.blogspot.com
Try not to become a man of success but rather to become a man of value.
Thanks,<br />James L. (Jim) Weaver<br /><a href="http://JavaFXpert.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">"Helping you become a JavaFXpert" weblog</a>
My Thoughts : http://passion4java.blogspot.com
Try not to become a man of success but rather to become a man of value.
Originally posted by James Weaver:
I see JavaFX Script as a way to achieve RIA that fully leverages the power of Java on the client.
Originally posted by Ulf Dittmer:
One of the aims of JavaFX (and of the "Consumer JRE") is to address some of the drawbacks of applets. It still makes sense to offload processing to the client; keeping a farm of servers that run web applications is expensive. So it depends on your perspective whether it's a good thing or a bad thing to run code on the client. What's not in doubt is that Java (applets or JavaFX) can provide a richer client environment than HTML/CSS/DOM/JavaScript.
offloading can be malicious and vulnerable
Originally posted by Ulf Dittmer:
I don't really see how. The Java client sandbox is rather more secure than executing JavaScript in a browser.
Originally posted by Rahesh Kumar:
Well. At the time of execution, Applets can gain control to the client system's resources, which is little unsafe. In a broswer based application, once scripts and other necessary things are offloaded to the client environment, not the entire functional code.
I had this thoughtfrom some source. What would be the advantage in the security aspect, if it is a sandbox, rather than a browser?
Originally posted by Prad Dip:
Can you tell us the resosurces over which applets gain control over ? thanks
Morning came much too soon and it brought along a friend named Margarita Hangover, and a tiny ad.
a bit of art, as a gift, that will fit in a stocking
https://gardener-gift.com
|