• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Bear Bibeault
  • Ron McLeod
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Paul Clapham
Sheriffs:
  • Tim Cooke
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • Junilu Lacar
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Moores
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • fred rosenberger
  • salvin francis
Bartenders:
  • Piet Souris
  • Frits Walraven
  • Carey Brown

Passed SCWCD UG (310-082) at 62%

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 1902
Hibernate Spring Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
They say that any test you pass is one you can list, but... ugh.

I bought a voucher for the 310-082 during the sale in June, and just put off until now taking it, since I already had my 310-080 and wasn't in a hurry, save to show that I'm keeping up to date. Makes me wonder, though, how 'up to date' I really am...

But first, the verdict.



Now, the good news is what I do at work, I know well. The bad news is the test was just plain ugly, and I got hit with a lot of things I either didn't know or second-guessed myself out of right answers. (I can already think of three or four Standard Action questions that the latter is true for.)

Ah well, anything you can say you passed, right?
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 95
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Congratz

A pass is a pass
 
author
Posts: 9000
19
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Congrats Theodore,

Can you explain 'ugly'

Does that mean it was hard, or was it bad in some way?

Thanks,

Bert
 
Theodore Casser
Ranch Hand
Posts: 1902
Hibernate Spring Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Originally posted by Bert Bates:
Can you explain 'ugly'

Does that mean it was hard, or was it bad in some way?



That it was very hard, rather than 'bad'. I guess I'm used to the full exam where there's questions in fields that I certainly know - the easier parts that are not 1.4 specific - rather than just the harder concentrations of the items that are more recent. Something that would keep my confidence up during the exam, really.

Didn't mean to make it sound like I thought something was 'wrong' with the upgrade exam. (And, it definitely made me make sure that I'm studying differently for the SCJP upgrade I'm doing in a few weeks.)
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic