• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Tim Cooke
  • Ron McLeod
  • paul wheaton
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
Sheriffs:
  • Paul Clapham
  • Devaka Cooray
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Holloway
  • Roland Mueller
  • Himai Minh
Bartenders:

JavaCaps mock 1 Q:27

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 51
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
27. What is correct about event handling in Java?
A) Java 1.0 event handling is compatible with event delegation model in Java 1.1
B) Java 1.0 and Java 1.1 event handling models are not compatible
C) Event listeners are the objects that implements listener interfaces.
D) You can add multiple listeners to any event source, then there is no guarantee that the listeners will be notified in the order in which they were added.
Answer:BCD
For C, I didn't see anything meaningful for this answer. First, there is not 'listener' interface. If you say it is a general speaking, it is a bad sentence here.
 
mister krabs
Posts: 13974
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
It is fine. "Listener interfaces" is the proper way to refer to the family of interfaces used for event handling. Every Java book will refer to them that way.
 
Consider Paul's rocket mass heater.
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic