That should be:
if there is local interface, the corresponding SLB can be exposed to local client.
if there is
remote interface, the corresponding SLB can be exposed to
remote client.
if there is endpoint interface, the corresponding SLB can be exposed to web service client.
Originally posted by Yi Si:
If can , can someone give some advice about such architecture?
Short answer: Don't do it.
Each interface is intended and effective at a different level of granularity because of the varying marshalling and invocation overhead. The coarser the granularity becomes the less object-oriented and the more service-like it becomes.
In order of ascending granularity (increasing marshalling and invocation overhead):
Java method invocation, local
EJB invocation, remote EJB invocation, Web service invocation.
For a more detailed explanation see:
Local Client Vs. Remote Client