Based upon the restrictions of the Basic Procile 1.0, I understand that the following fragments are wrong for the faultcode element in a soap Fault:
because the dot notation is disallowed and the namespace is defined as above.
However, is the dot notation illegal based on BP 1.0 if it is used within a custom namespace, as in:
[ May 09, 2007: Message edited by: Femi Anthony ]
posted 9 years ago
No, as I understand it
is fine, although the "Server" fault code is no longer the standard Server fault code defined by SOAP, but a namespace specific fault code that just happens to start with "Server" in the "http://nspace.com/faultcodes" namespace.
It is recommended that applications that require custom fault codes either use the SOAP1.1 defined fault codes and supply additional information in the detail element, or that they define these codes in a namespace that is controlled by the specifying authority.
[ May 10, 2007: Message edited by: michael warren ]
What are you doing? You are supposed to be reading this tiny ad!
the new thread boost feature brings a LOT of attention to your favorite threads