port numbers for protocols
Walter Vetrivel
Ranch Hand
Posts: 80
John Wetherbie
Rancher
Posts: 1449
posted 16 years ago
I don't think these protocols have their own ports because they are running on top of something else. At least I have never seen specific port numbers mentioned.
If they have an RFC associated with them it will talk about ports in there.
John
If they have an RFC associated with them it will talk about ports in there.
John
The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen all at once.
- Buckaroo Banzai
Jim Baiter
Ranch Hand
Posts: 532
Rahul Mahindrakar
Ranch Hand
Posts: 1869
posted 16 years ago
IIOP is 535 one can check it up here
One thing to keep in mind is the port for JRMP by default is 1099 and is not allocated by any authority. Since it is greater than 1024 anybody can use this port.
[This message has been edited by Rahul Mahindrakar (edited May 14, 2001).]
One thing to keep in mind is the port for JRMP by default is 1099 and is not allocated by any authority. Since it is greater than 1024 anybody can use this port.
[This message has been edited by Rahul Mahindrakar (edited May 14, 2001).]
| It is sorta covered in the JavaRanch Style Guide. |