Passed Part II/III with 87%
Len White
Greenhorn
Posts: 9
posted 15 years ago
Finally, after taking part III on 2/25 and several calls to Sun and Prometrics, my score was posted today.
The maximum number of points you could have received is 100, minimum to pass is 70. Class Diagram (44 maximum) .......................... 40 Component Diagram (44 maximum) ...................... 39 Sequence/Colloboration Diagrams (12 maximum) ........ 8
The maximum number of points you could have received is 100, minimum to pass is 70. Class Diagram (44 maximum) .......................... 40 Component Diagram (44 maximum) ...................... 39 Sequence/Colloboration Diagrams (12 maximum) ........ 8
Bagwan Mehrat
Ranch Hand
Posts: 119
Anonymous
Ranch Hand
Posts: 18944
finback
Greenhorn
Posts: 14
posted 15 years ago
White
I see you got a good scores at class diagram and I just got 29 points. could you make some communication with me about that? you can contact
me with finback2015@netease.com
I see you got a good scores at class diagram and I just got 29 points. could you make some communication with me about that? you can contact
me with finback2015@netease.com
Len White
Greenhorn
Posts: 9
posted 15 years ago
Yes, I was surprised to see that too. Obviously, they feel component and class diagrams are much more relevant to a J2EE architect. You could omit the sequence diagrams altogether and still pass with a good grade!
Jim Baker
Ranch Hand
Posts: 177
Len White
Greenhorn
Posts: 9
posted 15 years ago
I recall it asked how my solution would scale, how security is handled, whether I used CMP or BMP and why. Other than scaling, the others weren't reflected in my diagrams because I assumed they were more design and implementation details. If I had known they were going to ask these questions, I think I would have known more of what they are looking for in the assignment. I don't know why it is such a big secret. I wrestled with a lot of different considerations that I think are important in the real world, but ultimately my decision to include or exclude them was based on what I figured the assessors are looking for, not what a complete and good architecture would have.
So part III was really tough for me. For a couple of questions I had to answer that I hadn't addressed the issues in the diagrams. I did list a number of assumptions in my assignment about things I didn't address and why. That may have made the difference. At least they knew I had thought about them.
Originally posted by Jim Baker:
Congratulations.
Any suggestions for Part III. Thanks.
JB
I recall it asked how my solution would scale, how security is handled, whether I used CMP or BMP and why. Other than scaling, the others weren't reflected in my diagrams because I assumed they were more design and implementation details. If I had known they were going to ask these questions, I think I would have known more of what they are looking for in the assignment. I don't know why it is such a big secret. I wrestled with a lot of different considerations that I think are important in the real world, but ultimately my decision to include or exclude them was based on what I figured the assessors are looking for, not what a complete and good architecture would have.
So part III was really tough for me. For a couple of questions I had to answer that I hadn't addressed the issues in the diagrams. I did list a number of assumptions in my assignment about things I didn't address and why. That may have made the difference. At least they knew I had thought about them.
