I have been designing the assignment,It is said that Cade book for the phaseII is well worth reading,for it provide you the whole image in your mind as how to design your assignment ,and which detail level you may achieve in your own assignment. I have no ideal of component diagrams designing.For the component diagrams depicted in Cade book is quite simple,just a few component,and each seperate component does not have any relation. So I want to know who designed the component diagrams according to the the Cade book (in that it lists three separate diagrams)and have achieved the good score in component diagrams. Whether I can design the component diagrams broken down into several diagrams,and design them in very high level as these provided by Cade book?Any replies are appreciated.
posted 13 years ago
any ideals?In Cade book,the system designing of product order was broken down three packages,customer,order and catalog.Then there is one component diagram provide for each package.Totally,there are just only 3 component diagrams.And in each component diagram,there are about 6/7 subcomponents such as jsp,servlet controller,servicelocator,searchprocessor,dao,etc. So I don't know,if I design the real assignment according to the way (It's so high level and much simple,I think)provided by Cade book,whether I can get higher score in component diagrams?
What are you doing? You are supposed to be reading this tiny ad!
the new thread boost feature brings a LOT of attention to your favorite threads