• Post Reply
  • Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic

class diagram perspective.

 
Giju George
Ranch Hand
Posts: 333
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I don't know how far we need to give details in the class diagram. Most of the guys who passed the exam made it more or less technology independent. So if I understand correctly, we need to cater for the conceptual perspective, which is language independent(according to UML distilled) and describing the most significant concepts and relations of the problem domain, with no methods and attributes( acc to sun's requirement).

Or should it be more oriented towards a specification perspective, which describe the actual classes and interfaces of the application instead of the concepts of the problem domain.
 
Michael Zhao
Ranch Hand
Posts: 77
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I read Mark Cade's guide and did the class diagram in the similiar way in Chapter 8
 
Ali Reza Hosseini
Ranch Hand
Posts: 33
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
hi,

i am going to distinguish between three different types of classes
in my class diagramm

boundaries
controlls
entities

I think this is technology independent enough. other people passed the
exam having only entities described, as I read here in other threads.
 
  • Post Reply
  • Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic