• Post Reply
  • Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic

passed part 1

 
madhav kamal
Greenhorn
Posts: 18
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi

Thank you very much ranchers

I cleared part 1 with 83% yesterday.

ContainerModel -------------25%
Design patterns ------------60%
Security -------------------50%
Legacy Connectivity --------60%

i am not too happy about getting 25% in Conainer Model .rest are my weak areas so didnt mind at all.

There are some post s in the forum saying you dont have to be pro for part 1 anybody can clear with real question mocks available online.

i dont know about this argument in my case i am truly haapy it gave me Feel Good factor as i know my weak areas and work on it.more over better understnding what we are doing why we doing.

before part2 i would like to go for IBM OOAD UML any suggestions?
 
Laxmi Raghu
Ranch Hand
Posts: 218
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hello Madhav,

U did well. Got good percentage ... atleast better than me. No need to feel bad about anything. Now u know your weak area. Do some study on that to get hold on the concepts.

All the best for Part II and part III.
Laxmi
 
vivek ja
Ranch Hand
Posts: 80
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Congrats Madhav!!!

Can you tell me what books/materials you used for preparation?
 
Santosh Pasupuleti
Ranch Hand
Posts: 97
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Congraulations Madhav Kamal. Cheers
 
madhav kamal
Greenhorn
Posts: 18
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
hi

Thank You very much guys
 
madhav kamal
Greenhorn
Posts: 18
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Originally posted by vivek ja:
Congrats Madhav!!!

Can you tell me what books/materials you used for preparation?


Hi vivek

1 Mark Cade book.
2 SCBCD guide by manning [even though i am not taking SCBCD ,i found this is convinient for j2ee aspects of SCEA]
3 UML Distilled Martin Fowler.
4 Design patterns by Gang of four

5 SCEA study guile paul allen et all[dont go for this]

Whizlabs i found very useful.
some notes in scea yahoo groups n Ranch links .

do as many mocks as available thats helps.

best of luck for your part 1
 
vrayudu kumar
Ranch Hand
Posts: 79
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi Madhav,

I am preparing for part I, going through Paul book. Can you tell me what is wrong with that book and the chapters?

Thanks,
Vijay.
 
madhav kamal
Greenhorn
Posts: 18
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Originally posted by vrayudu kumar:
Hi Madhav,

I am preparing for part I, going through Paul book. Can you tell me what is wrong with that book and the chapters?

Thanks,
Vijay.


Hi vijay

everything in the boook .it was badly written for SCEA objectives.

Starting with common arch ,security.....specially legacy connectivity giving c++ connector example [with out mentioning legacy aspects]


i started with that book ,wasted some time after that MARK CADE book.gives very good idea about SCEA objective s and what you should know .

best of luck to your part1
 
  • Post Reply
  • Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic