• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Tim Cooke
  • paul wheaton
  • Paul Clapham
  • Ron McLeod
Sheriffs:
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Liutauras Vilda
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
  • Roland Mueller
  • Piet Souris
Bartenders:

SCEA Part II

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 49
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi All,

Where should the design pattern reflect in my UML diagram: class, sequence, component or all three?

To explain my question in detail:

While expending the BDM, should the Object decomposition go to a level where I would be showing the classes like DAO, Composite Entity, Fast Lane Reader etc?
And in turn should I be showing them as a part of sequence diagram?


Thanks in advance.

Bobby
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 1183
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi Bobby,

Based on Code's class diagram, I consider this diagram as a view of only the business objects, supported by some classes which provide workflow methods. The classes which you mentioned - DAO, Composite Entity and Fast Lane Reader are part of the J2EE framework and therefore belong to the Component diagram; again, based on Case.

Regards,
Dan
 
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic