Supporting Documentation - Part II

[Anand Jaiswal]

I am done with the diagrams for Part II and am in the process of creating the supporting documentation. I have checked and rechecked the exam deliverables for Part II and they don't mandate supporting documentation. Considering Part III is about the decisions you made for Part II what amount of supporting documentation is really required? I am basically planning on providing documentation only for the class and component diagrams and possibly an assumptions document. Is there really any need for documenting the sequence diagrams? I would really appreciate some guidance from people who have taken Part II.

[Maris Orbidans]

Originally posted by Anand Jaiswal:
I am done with the diagrams for Part II and am in the process of creating the supporting documentation. I have checked and rechecked the exam deliverables for Part II and they don't mandate supporting documentation.

Only assumptions document is required.

[Santiago Urrizola]

if you have good diagrmas .. UML speak for itself, so you dont need to write a los of documentation explaning wath you do, bu for example if you change some cardinalities of DBM you mus justify it ...