Cleared Part II 90%
Tom Adams
Ranch Hand
Posts: 56
posted 11 years ago
Hi All,
I uploaded part II and took the part III test on 8/25 and the results were posted on 9/17...so, it took a little less than 3 weeks for the grade.
This report shows the total points that could have been awarded in each section and the actual amount of points you were awarded. This information is provided in order to give you feedback on your relative strengths on a section basis. The maximum number of points you could have received is 100, minimum to pass is 70.
Class Diagram (44 maximum) .......................... 36
Component Diagram (44 maximum) ...................... 42
Sequence/Colloboration Diagrams (12 maximum) ........ 12
Most of my points were lost on the Class Diagram...not sure why. I had 18 classes (including stateless session beans) - maybe I was missing something?
Notes
I did use UML 2.0 on the assignment - shows up mostly in the sequence diagrams and component diagram. Used Visio as a UML modeling tool - not that bad there are some UML 2.0 stencils available. Other items I included: Deployment diagram, class diagram descriptions, assumption section, brief (2 paragrahs) summary on each non-functional system aspect.
I spent a lot of time searching through this forum. Thanks to all who have contributed.
I uploaded part II and took the part III test on 8/25 and the results were posted on 9/17...so, it took a little less than 3 weeks for the grade.
This report shows the total points that could have been awarded in each section and the actual amount of points you were awarded. This information is provided in order to give you feedback on your relative strengths on a section basis. The maximum number of points you could have received is 100, minimum to pass is 70.
Class Diagram (44 maximum) .......................... 36
Component Diagram (44 maximum) ...................... 42
Sequence/Colloboration Diagrams (12 maximum) ........ 12
Most of my points were lost on the Class Diagram...not sure why. I had 18 classes (including stateless session beans) - maybe I was missing something?
Notes
I spent a lot of time searching through this forum. Thanks to all who have contributed.
Tom
Nancy Dawson
Greenhorn
Posts: 13
posted 11 years ago
I don't really understand why people include deployment diagram, am i missing something here
Originally posted by Tom Adams:
Hi All,
I uploaded part II and took the part III test on 8/25 and the results were posted on 9/17...so, it took a little less than 3 weeks for the grade.
This report shows the total points that could have been awarded in each section and the actual amount of points you were awarded. This information is provided in order to give you feedback on your relative strengths on a section basis. The maximum number of points you could have received is 100, minimum to pass is 70.
Class Diagram (44 maximum) .......................... 36
Component Diagram (44 maximum) ...................... 42
Sequence/Colloboration Diagrams (12 maximum) ........ 12
Most of my points were lost on the Class Diagram...not sure why. I had 18 classes (including stateless session beans) - maybe I was missing something?
Notes
I did use UML 2.0 on the assignment - shows up mostly in the sequence diagrams and component diagram. Used Visio as a UML modeling tool - not that bad there are some UML 2.0 stencils available. Other items I included: Deployment diagram, class diagram descriptions, assumption section, brief (2 paragrahs) summary on each non-functional system aspect.
I spent a lot of time searching through this forum. Thanks to all who have contributed.
I don't really understand why people include deployment diagram, am i missing something here
Balaji Rajagopalan
Greenhorn
Posts: 9
Santiago Urrizola
Ranch Hand
Posts: 172
posted 11 years ago
Congratulations !! grate score.
And Nancy .. deplyment diagrams helps to see the phisical distribution of the system, like where is deployed each component, in what app server, in what machine ...etc. They are very helpfully, i make 2 deployments diagram.
And Nancy .. deplyment diagrams helps to see the phisical distribution of the system, like where is deployed each component, in what app server, in what machine ...etc. They are very helpfully, i make 2 deployments diagram.
Santiago Urrizola : La Plata - Argentina<br />SCEA (89%-92%)<br /><a href="http://gpitech.wordpress.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://gpitech.wordpress.com/</a>
Cleuton Sampaio
Ranch Hand
Posts: 181
Nancy Dawson
Greenhorn
Posts: 13
Tom Adams
Ranch Hand
Posts: 56
posted 11 years ago
Thanks for the congrats...
I only had one class diagram which was a business domain model...no tech specific classes (except for SLBs).
I found that having a deployment diagram helped explain how some of the non-functional requirements were supported.
For the most part I built the architecture using Entity Beans / CMP / CMT.
[ September 19, 2006: Message edited by: Tom Adams ]
I only had one class diagram which was a business domain model...no tech specific classes (except for SLBs).
I found that having a deployment diagram helped explain how some of the non-functional requirements were supported.
For the most part I built the architecture using Entity Beans / CMP / CMT.
[ September 19, 2006: Message edited by: Tom Adams ]
Tom
|