Win a copy of The Little Book of Impediments (e-book only) this week in the Agile and Other Processes forum!
  • Post Reply
  • Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic

UML

 
S. Kroschk
Greenhorn
Posts: 3
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi,

formost (it's my first posting) let me say thanks for all the valuable input I got so far by reading this forum!

My, very short, question:
I'm wondering if it would be accaptable to ommit get()/set() methods of transfer objects by specifying the (private) attributes and adding a comment like
"In order to reduce complexity of the diagram, the get() and set() methods for the attributes specifed have been ommited."?

Regards
Stefan
 
saurabh suman
Greenhorn
Posts: 16
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
you can do that ...I would suggest not to show the attributes also.
If your design suggests that showing attribute is necessary only then show then only show otherwise you can exclude them.
 
  • Post Reply
  • Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic