Win a copy of The Little Book of Impediments (e-book only) this week in the Agile and Other Processes forum!
  • Post Reply
  • Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic

what's wrong with this?

 
Hasitha Randika
Ranch Hand
Posts: 50
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
why no one is replying for my questions?
 
Ulf Dittmer
Rancher
Posts: 42969
73
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Are you referring to this old post?

Maybe because few people are interested in the SCMAD (witness how few posts this forum gets). Or maybe because it's not clear what "the specification for the SCMAD" is.
 
Shrihan De Mel
Greenhorn
Posts: 3
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
ehehheh
 
Cameron Wallace McKenzie
author and cow tipper
Saloon Keeper
Posts: 4968
1
Hibernate Spring Tomcat Server
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
One problem with this is that it is used to imply mere contradistinction, as opposed to that.

The other problem is that it has two implementations in Java, one that has to do with dot notation, such as this.name, while the other implementation has to do with constructors, such as this() or this(username);

I'm not going to cast judgement as say it's 'wrong or right.' I've just come to accept that this is, and I've accepted that because of that, it is what is is. This is, that is.

By the way, the old post clearly asks for the SCMCD specification, not the SCMAD specification. The two are clearly different.

-Cameron McKenzie
[ January 11, 2008: Message edited by: Cameron McKenzie ]
 
  • Post Reply
  • Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic