Win a copy of Java Mock Exams (software) this week in the Programmer Certification (OCPJP) forum!
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic

RemoveException or RemoteException

 
Leon Chen
Ranch Hand
Posts: 96
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
From J2EE 1.3 EJB API:
public void remove(java.lang.Object primaryKey) throws java.rmi.RemoteException, RemoveException
Remove an EJB object identified by its primary key. This method can be used only for an entity bean. An attempt to call this method on a session bean will result in a RemoteException.
From EJB 2.0 Specification:
Because session objects do not have primary keys that are accessible to clients, invoking the javax.ejb.EJBHOME.remove(Object primaryKey) method on a session bean result in the javax.ejb.RemoveException
 
Anselm Paulinus
Ranch Hand
Posts: 390
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
What is the question here?
 
Anselm Paulinus
Ranch Hand
Posts: 390
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
The API addressed entity bean and the spec addressed session bean and both are correct. What is the problem here?
 
Leon Chen
Ranch Hand
Posts: 96
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Please read it again
 
Anselm Paulinus
Ranch Hand
Posts: 390
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I got yeah Mr. Chen:
The issue is actually about RemoteException and RemoveException.
Sorry I jumped in without invitation. I do not think that I am qualified right now to contribute to this topic until I get my HF EJB from Amazon.
Thanks,
Anselm.
 
Vishwa Kumba
Ranch Hand
Posts: 1066
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Even I was carried away a bit by the question, as it had 2 stmts with no question. I tried to remove a stateless session bean in Sun's RI with the home handle and I obtained on the client side.
javax.ejb.RemoveException: Invalid remove operation.
<<no stack trace available>>
So the EJB2.0 Spec is right. Isn't it?
 
Happiness is not a goal ... it's a by-product of a life well lived - Eleanor Roosevelt. Tiny ad:
the new thread boost feature: great for the advertiser and smooth for the coderanch user
https://coderanch.com/t/674455/Thread-Boost-feature
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
Boost this thread!