• Post Reply
  • Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic

"unchecked" element

 
Sany Bel
Ranch Hand
Posts: 51
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
According to the example shown on page 581 of the HF book, <unchecked> tag should be empty. But, then on page 596 for question #2 which says:
What's true about methods that should run without being checked for authorization?
why is option B (They can be listed in the <unchecked> element) correct.
As per the example nothing should be listed in <unchecked> element.
 
Nathaniel Stoddard
Ranch Hand
Posts: 1258
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Ha, I remember that part of the book. It's wrong. Just pat yourself on the back and move on.
 
Kathy Sierra
Cowgirl and Author
Rancher
Posts: 1589
5
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Yep -- Nathaniel's right--this is bad wording on our part. Instead of saying "...in the <unchecked/> element" it should have said something like, "...with the <unchecked/> element" or "...using the <unchecked/> element." So, it wasn't meant to be a trick question about whether you knew that <unchecked/> is technically an empty tag. It was just supposed to test whether you knew about <unchecked/> and its relationship to method permissions.
Nathaniel, just wanted to say that you're awesome.
cheers,
Kathy
 
Sany Bel
Ranch Hand
Posts: 51
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Thanks Nathaniel and Kathy
 
  • Post Reply
  • Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic