Marco Tedone<br />SCJP1.4,SCJP5,SCBCD,SCWCD
Originally posted by Marco Tedone:
What's true about the client's view of an entity bean's remote component interface? (Choose all that apply)
C. Entity beans may not survive a crash of the container
I answered A,C but the correct one was only A.
SCJP 1.4 / 5.0 - SCBCD 1.3 - SCWCD 1.4 - IBM 484
Marco Tedone<br />SCJP1.4,SCJP5,SCBCD,SCWCD
Regards,<br /> <br />Paulo Nunes (Brazil)<br />MCP OCP IBM285 SCJP 1.4 SCWCD 1.4 SCBCD 1.3 SCEA (I)
Originally posted by Ryan Wong:
spec 4.3.2
The entity, its primary key and its remote interface survive the crash of a EJB container.
The entity, its primary key, and its remote reference
Marco Tedone<br />SCJP1.4,SCJP5,SCBCD,SCWCD
Originally posted by Joe Nguyen:
The client�s view is that the entity is right there
Suppose an entity bean was in the middle of the transaction while the container crashed. Unless the container had saved the entity state somewhere just before it died, the client would notice the differences when interacting with the bean after the container have been restored.
SCJP 1.4 / 5.0 - SCBCD 1.3 - SCWCD 1.4 - IBM 484
Originally posted by Vinicius Boson:
I�ve never tried but i **think** that it�s possible (and the specs guarantees) that if the container rises again, the client would call methods on the component interface normally. Am i right ?
Marco Tedone<br />SCJP1.4,SCJP5,SCBCD,SCWCD
Barry's not gonna like this. Barry's not gonna like this one bit. What is Barry's deal with tiny ads?
Smokeless wood heat with a rocket mass heater
https://woodheat.net
|