both CMP and CMR fields are virtual fields?
yamini nadella
Ranch Hand
Posts: 257
Nileesha Bojjawar
Ranch Hand
Posts: 85
posted 12 years ago
Hi Yamini,
Sorry for replying late, But Good to know things even after completion of the exam.
According to spec 10.1.3 Entity Bean Providers Programming Contract
The container-managed persistent fields and container-managed relationship fields must not be defined in the entity bean class. From the perspective of the Bean Provider, the container-managed persistent fields and container-managed relationship fields are virtual fields only, and are accessed through get and set accessor methods. The implementation of the container-managed persistent fields and container-managed relationship fields is supplied by the container.
So the answer to your question YES both CMP and CMR are virtual fields
Hope that helps.
[ October 07, 2004: Message edited by: Nileesha Bojjawar ]
[ October 07, 2004: Message edited by: Nileesha Bojjawar ]
Sorry for replying late, But Good to know things even after completion of the exam.
According to spec 10.1.3 Entity Bean Providers Programming Contract
The container-managed persistent fields and container-managed relationship fields must not be defined in the entity bean class. From the perspective of the Bean Provider, the container-managed persistent fields and container-managed relationship fields are virtual fields only, and are accessed through get and set accessor methods. The implementation of the container-managed persistent fields and container-managed relationship fields is supplied by the container.
So the answer to your question YES both CMP and CMR are virtual fields
Hope that helps.
[ October 07, 2004: Message edited by: Nileesha Bojjawar ]
[ October 07, 2004: Message edited by: Nileesha Bojjawar ]
Nileesha<br />SCJP 1.4, SCBCD, SCWCD.
