Win a copy of Pipeline as Code this week in the Cloud/Virtualization forum!
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Ron McLeod
  • Paul Clapham
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Bear Bibeault
Sheriffs:
  • Rob Spoor
  • Henry Wong
  • Liutauras Vilda
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Moores
  • Carey Brown
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • Piet Souris
Bartenders:
  • Frits Walraven
  • Himai Minh
  • Jj Roberts

What happend CMT inside BMT ?? (see)

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 148
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
This is what I understood... if there any errors please correct me

My problem is...

CMT (start)
|
|BMT (start)
|
|BMT (end)
|
|
CMT (end)



Let say CMT inside BMT(as above). According to theory once BMT execute it will suspend CMT temporarly. Then let say BMT will rollback due to some reason
What happend to CMT ??

what i understood from book is BMT will roll back, and CMT will never roll back. Is that applicable for reality ??
please just explain me if any one knows

 
Greenhorn
Posts: 11
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I also think the BMT will roll back, and CMT will not roll back but in reality , the BMT method will probably throw an application exception to indicate this behaviour...

Greetz
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 82
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Dilip,

When transaction started by BMT is rollback, transaction started by CMT will not be rollbacked and it will continue once BMT method call is completed.
 
Greenhorn
Posts: 14
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Isn't this nested transaction that aren't supported by current EJB?
 
Greenhorn
Posts: 22
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
No... a nested transaction would imply that there's a dependency between the CMT and BMT transaction but, there is no such relationship.

The BMT and CMT execute under separate,unrelated transactions.
 
Dilip Gamage
Ranch Hand
Posts: 148
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Arun Krishnamoorthy says

The BMT and CMT execute under separate,unrelated transactions



Seperate ??
do you mean CMT suspended when executing BMT and behave seperately. But CMT nested transaction require to complete the BMT to commit the CMT as mention above ^

I didn't get the answer ? yet. Thanks you all attempt my problem
 
Arun Krishnamoorthy
Greenhorn
Posts: 22
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Yes, the CMT transaction suspends before the BMT transaction is started.
Transactions can never propagate into a BMT bean. BMT beans always execute under their own transactions.
 
It's just like a fortune cookie, but instead of a cookie, it's pie. And we'll call it ... tiny ad:
SKIP - a book about connecting industrious people with elderly land owners
https://coderanch.com/t/skip-book
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic