• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • Bear Bibeault
  • Tim Cooke
  • Junilu Lacar
Sheriffs:
  • Paul Clapham
  • Devaka Cooray
  • Knute Snortum
Saloon Keepers:
  • Ron McLeod
  • Tim Moores
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • Frits Walraven
Bartenders:
  • Carey Brown
  • salvin francis
  • Claude Moore

sample Question  RSS feed

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 146
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Problem

Given:
Bean A with transaction attributes of "RequiresNew" for all its methods.
Bean B with transaction attributes of "Supports" for all its methods.
A client having a transaction context calls a method mA() on bean A, which in turns calls a method mB() on Bean B.

Assuming all invocations are local, which of the following statements is correct if mB() encounters a system exception?

Options

Select 3 correct options.

1) The client's transaction will be marked for roll back.
2) The client will get a javax.ejb.EJBException but it can continue with the same transaction.
3) The client will get a javax.ejb.TransactionRolledbackLocalException
4) The bean B instance will be discarded.
5) mA() will get a javax.ejb.TransactionRolledbackLocalException
6) The bean A instance will NOT be discarded.
7) Changes made to the database by mA(), will be commited.

The correct answers marked was 2,4,5. but i disagree with 2 being correct. the spec only states that the client tran may or may not be marked for rollback.

Has this kind of questions appeared on the real exam?
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 59
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hey,
The option "The client will get a javax.ejb.EJBException but it can continue with the same transaction" does not mean that the client transaction is rolledback. I feel that it's a way of informing the client that something bad has happened during the execution of method A. Now it's upto the client to decide if it should continue the transaction it owns or not.

Ranchers,
Please correct me if I am wrong.

HTH,
Sandeep
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 135
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Srividhya,
I think we discussed this question before.
choice 2 confuses some times..

see, Client running/calling his methods may be in a transaction or not in a transaction and calls methods on Bean A which starts a new transaction which is TxA and you get exception in that transaction. So you just inform back the client that some thing went wrong in TxA and its upto the client to decide to roll back his transaction or not.

Client(TxC or no transaction) ------> Bean A (TxA) ------> Bean B (TxA)

Hope this time this is clearer.

Thanks,
Ugender
[ June 28, 2006: Message edited by: Ugender Rekulampally ]
 
Consider Paul's rocket mass heater.
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
Boost this thread!