• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Ron McLeod
  • Paul Clapham
  • Liutauras Vilda
Sheriffs:
  • paul wheaton
  • Rob Spoor
  • Devaka Cooray
Saloon Keepers:
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
  • Frits Walraven
  • Tim Moores
Bartenders:
  • Mikalai Zaikin

Doubt about body-content possible values

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 95
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi All!!

I have a doubt regarding the body-content permissible values for Classic Tags.

As per SCWCD Study Kit by Manning,

For Classic tags : JSP(default), tagdependent , empty

For Simple tags: scriptless(default) , tagdependent , empty

For Tag Files : scriptless(default) , tagdependent , empty

I agree that we can't use JSP in simple tags or tag files...

Can Anyone tell me whether we can use scriptless in classic tags??
I don't see any reason why we can't use scriptless in classic tags.
HFSJ does not say anything about this....

Ranchers please help!
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 1936
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I think JSP is superset of scriptless.
That is if you use JSP as body content value, you can use scriptless too.
Could someone confirm my thought is right or not?
[ November 02, 2005: Message edited by: Kengkaj Sathianpantarit ]
 
AmitKumar Jain
Ranch Hand
Posts: 95
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Ya I agree with you...
If I mention JSP in body-content, then I can use el/custom tags/actions (all are scriptless)
But still scriptless will be needed to restrict the developer to el etc.

Hence, my main question is that: Is "scriptless" a valid body-content value for Classic Tags ...
 
Consider Paul's rocket mass heater.
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic