• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Ron McLeod
  • Paul Clapham
  • Liutauras Vilda
Sheriffs:
  • paul wheaton
  • Rob Spoor
  • Devaka Cooray
Saloon Keepers:
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
  • Frits Walraven
  • Tim Moores
Bartenders:
  • Mikalai Zaikin

TLDs

 
Greenhorn
Posts: 11
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi,

Is the TLD for simple tags any different to TLD for Custom tags ?

I have seen a TLD such as this:
<taglib>
<taglib-uri>stuff</taglib-uri>
<taglib-location>locationofStuff</taglib-location>
</taglib>

and also a TLD such as:
<tlib-version>1.2</tlib-version>
<uri>simpleTags</uri>
<tag>

</tag>

These two seem to be in different formats ?

thanks,

Matt
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 56
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi,

Yes the two do seem to be different, but they have to be because the first one is from a DD and the second one is from the actual TLD. You are not required to write the taglib element in the DD for your TLD's according to the new specs.

And as for your question, the difference between the TLD for a simple and a classic tag, there isn't any. You can't make out from a TLD whether the tag handler is a simple or a classic one.

Hope this helps.

Bharathi
 
Consider Paul's rocket mass heater.
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic