My (unofficial) Review of Charles' book
posted 11 years ago
I still have not read chapters 15, 16, 17, 20, or 21 but the last two are not related to the exam anyway. I also have not yet taken the online mock exam. When I finish these, I'll submit my official review to the JavaRanch Bunkhouse. I've not settled on a final horseshoe rating, but as of right now I'm pretty certain it will be an eight or nine out of ten.
I really like this book. It is very well written for a book not invaded by a team of editors. It flows as if you are having a conversation with a single expert. I've never seen that done well in a technology book before.
The book claims to not be intended as a beginner's book but I believe the author did well enough to explain basic concepts well enough that a rookie could study with this companion just as well as any other.
That said, the more experience you have, the more you'll appreciate the layout of this book, as the information is very structured with little foofoo noise. This structure is especially helpful for learning class APIs, the web.xml, and standard actions. Most exam-sitters will skim through study material a couple extra times during the final week before taking the exam and the SCWCD Study Companion is certainly the best book on the market for such cramming... er, reviewing.
The weakest area of the book is in Design Patterns, which for the most part isn't strong enough on its own to guarantee a perfect score for that topic on the exam.
Each chapter follows with about fifteen superb questions. There is a definite purpose behind each question. They help to enforce what important points you should remember from the chapter and what silly (though important) tricks to look out for in the exam. You can tell that the author put a copious amount of time into writing thoughtful questions.
The question most people will be asking is how this book compares to HFSJ. It's smaller and easier to carry. I find that, though there are fewer pictures and jokes, I can make it through more topics before my brain starts to hurt. I think this is because the high level of organization makes it easy for my brain to sort. HFSJ may be more fun to read, but HFSJ usually makes my brain demand frequent timeouts to defrag all the information. The Study Companion makes a better reference book, a better book for subsequent reads, and is much easier to transport between work and home.
If you can afford two books, definitely get the Study Companion and HFSJ. If you can only afford one, choose the one that best fits your style of learning.
I really like this book. It is very well written for a book not invaded by a team of editors. It flows as if you are having a conversation with a single expert. I've never seen that done well in a technology book before.
The book claims to not be intended as a beginner's book but I believe the author did well enough to explain basic concepts well enough that a rookie could study with this companion just as well as any other.
That said, the more experience you have, the more you'll appreciate the layout of this book, as the information is very structured with little foofoo noise. This structure is especially helpful for learning class APIs, the web.xml, and standard actions. Most exam-sitters will skim through study material a couple extra times during the final week before taking the exam and the SCWCD Study Companion is certainly the best book on the market for such cramming... er, reviewing.
The weakest area of the book is in Design Patterns, which for the most part isn't strong enough on its own to guarantee a perfect score for that topic on the exam.
Each chapter follows with about fifteen superb questions. There is a definite purpose behind each question. They help to enforce what important points you should remember from the chapter and what silly (though important) tricks to look out for in the exam. You can tell that the author put a copious amount of time into writing thoughtful questions.
The question most people will be asking is how this book compares to HFSJ. It's smaller and easier to carry. I find that, though there are fewer pictures and jokes, I can make it through more topics before my brain starts to hurt. I think this is because the high level of organization makes it easy for my brain to sort. HFSJ may be more fun to read, but HFSJ usually makes my brain demand frequent timeouts to defrag all the information. The Study Companion makes a better reference book, a better book for subsequent reads, and is much easier to transport between work and home.
If you can afford two books, definitely get the Study Companion and HFSJ. If you can only afford one, choose the one that best fits your style of learning.
A good workman is known by his tools.
Shivani Chandna
Ranch Hand
Posts: 380
posted 11 years ago
Thanks for the review Marc.
How does it compare to Manning's Study Kit would be interesting to know too.
The question most people will be asking is how this book compares to HFSJ.
How does it compare to Manning's Study Kit would be interesting to know too.
[My Blog]
All roads lead to JavaRanch
Anthony Karta
Ranch Hand
Posts: 342
posted 11 years ago
I've always thought that the Manning book did the best of any SCWCD book at design patterns. But everything else in Charles' book is better.
Originally posted by Satou kurinosuke:
How does it compare to Manning's Study Kit would be interesting to know too.
I've always thought that the Manning book did the best of any SCWCD book at design patterns. But everything else in Charles' book is better.
A good workman is known by his tools.
posted 11 years ago
Thank you for pointing this out. I'm going to strip off those pages and burn the rest
I've always thought that the Manning book did the best of any SCWCD book at design patterns.
Thank you for pointing this out. I'm going to strip off those pages and burn the rest
[My Blog]
All roads lead to JavaRanch
Priya dharshini
Ranch Hand
Posts: 78
Amit Batra
Ranch Hand
Posts: 361
posted 11 years ago
It's hard to say how long it took. Most of it was over the course of the past couple days. I think someone that's already familiar with the material could make it through the entire book (including the revision questions) in a week easily without it feeling like a chore. I averaged two chapters per sitting but my breaks were simply to check on the forum here and research to verify the book's accuracy.
Originally posted by Amitabha Batranab:
Marc,
how long did this take to read? and how many pages per sitting were you able to read and digest?
It's hard to say how long it took. Most of it was over the course of the past couple days. I think someone that's already familiar with the material could make it through the entire book (including the revision questions) in a week easily without it feeling like a chore. I averaged two chapters per sitting but my breaks were simply to check on the forum here and research to verify the book's accuracy.
A good workman is known by his tools.
