Win a copy of Testing JavaScript Applications this week in the HTML Pages with CSS and JavaScript forum!
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Bear Bibeault
  • Ron McLeod
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Paul Clapham
  • Tim Cooke
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • Junilu Lacar
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Moores
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • fred rosenberger
  • salvin francis
  • Piet Souris
  • Frits Walraven
  • Carey Brown

A question for Java Ranch alumni.

Posts: 21
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
How complex should the GUI be ?
I am unsure as to how sophisticated I should make the user interface. Is it wise to play exactly to the spec e.g.
Only allow searching on the 2 fields cited or provide more ?
Do I provide sorting or not - this is particularly worrying as there is a mention in the spec that elaborate algorithms should not be used where standard solutions already exist, but on the other hand it would seem a natural feature to include for a JTable.
Are toolbars necessary given the limited functionality ?
Do I bother with status bars, MicroHelp About boxes etc ?
Should I provide asynchronous requests to the remote client by implementing multithreading ?
Does any of this matter much ?
Also thought I'd sound this one out.
With a mind to anticipating future requirements (referred to in the spec)
I was going to provide an xml file that defined the JComponents, fields to be queried on, validation required, data type etc along with code to dynamically build these as controls at run time.
I think I have decided against this, partly due to a lack of confidence in whether the org.xml.* packages are admissable (despite being part of the Production JDK) and partly because I feel it may be seen as over-engineering.
Also, there are 2 perfectly reasonable implementations of JTable utility classes provided in the demos section of the JDK. In the spirit of code reuse It would seem sensible to include these (With accreditation of course), but I have doubts the examiners would see it that way.
Any thoughts ?
What's gotten into you? Could it be this tiny ad?
Thread Boost feature
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic