Also, what should be the name of
the final jar file containing all these stuff.
Originally posted by Pete Lyons:
Why are you jarring the source, object code, and javadoc? I am planning on just having the 2 executable jars and everything else as regular files, and then bundling it all up into one big jar to submit.
In the README.txt, we have to specifiy the name of files we are submitting with a high level description of each. So I thought it would be good to keep individual things as seperate jar files. Is it a bad idea? Should I change it? What do u think?
Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage - to move in the opposite direction. - Ernst F. Schumacher
Originally posted by Michael Morris:
Hi Jacob,
I really think you should only jar up your executables. I know it's a pain to list every file but I think that's what Sun is expecting.
Michael Morris
Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage - to move in the opposite direction. - Ernst F. Schumacher
Originally posted by Michael Morris:
Hi Jacob,
I just used high level descriptions like javadoc generated HTML file or java source file.
Hope this helps,
Michael Morris
Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage - to move in the opposite direction. - Ernst F. Schumacher
I just had the craziest dream. This tiny ad was in it.
Smokeless wood heat with a rocket mass heater
https://woodheat.net
|