• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Ron McLeod
  • Paul Clapham
  • Tim Cooke
  • Devaka Cooray
Sheriffs:
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • paul wheaton
  • Rob Spoor
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Moores
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • Piet Souris
  • Mikalai Zaikin
Bartenders:
  • Carey Brown
  • Roland Mueller

URLyBird 1.2.1 - MUST not use the network server code

 
Greenhorn
Posts: 6
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi all,

I have a question about the non networked mode which says "not to use the network server code".

I'm deciding to use the following design on my server implementation:

Networked Mode:
GUI --> ServerAdapter (RemoteServerAdapter)--RMI--> RemoteRoomsServer --> RoomsDAO
Non-Networked Mode:
GUI --> ServerAdapter (LocalServerAdapter) --> RoomsDAO

There would be a factory for the ServerAdapter, which would get the correct implementation based on the mode (alone or server).

The RoomsDAO is the class that communicates with the Data class (which implements DBAccess). By using this approach, both networked and non-networked modes are using the "same code". However the second approach bypasses the network.

My question is:
Is my design compliant with the requirement below?

"The operating mode is selected using the single command line argument that is permitted. Architecturally, this mode must use the database and GUI from the networked form, but must not use the network server code at all. "

Thanks in advance,

Kiev Gama
 
author and jackaroo
Posts: 12200
280
Mac IntelliJ IDE Firefox Browser Oracle C++ Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi Kiev,

Welcome to JavaRanch and this forum.

It certainly looks like you are meeting that requirement. Was there something specific that you thought might be problematic?

Regards, Andrew
 
Kiev Gama
Greenhorn
Posts: 6
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I was not sure of what exactly was the "network server code". I see that it is meant to be the class that implements the java.rmi.Remote interface, not the particular class that has the "server code" (RoomsDAO) that deals with the Data.

So I thought I was violating the requirement because the same "server code" is responsible for dealing with the data in the server and alone modes. However, the network stuff is only in the RemoteServerAdapter.

Thanks for your opinion!

Best Regards,

Kiev
 
You can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because
We need your help - Coderanch server fundraiser
https://coderanch.com/wiki/782867/Coderanch-server-fundraiser
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic