• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic

Info about Vector

 
Abiodun Okusolubo
Ranch Hand
Posts: 72
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Using Vector to hold reference object. If more objects are added to the vector or/and objects removed
can one guarantee that the positions of remaining objects still be arranged in such a way that objects are kept in sequence in which they were
before adding or removing objects.

Thanks
 
Saheed Adepoju
Ranch Hand
Posts: 267
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Good day!
Well i suppose the Vector class has add(int index,Object o) since it implements the List Interface, so i suppose u could still reference the the object via the index of the object!But i would suggest using an ArrayList cause of the Overhead associated with it(would add a performance hit cause it is synchronised in Nature)!Anyways just a suggestion!Have a nice day!
 
Abiodun Okusolubo
Ranch Hand
Posts: 72
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
The need for vector is hold reference reference to JTable object, also, synchronization in vector does not play a significant part in performance in this case. My point is, after changing data in the vector how much does it affect the arrangement of this data arrangement. I read somewhere that object arrangement in Arraylist cannot be guaranteed especially when data has been added or removed.
 
What are you doing? You are supposed to be reading this tiny ad!
the new thread boost feature brings a LOT of attention to your favorite threads
https://coderanch.com/t/674455/Thread-Boost-feature
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
Boost this thread!