Originally posted by Rod Hilton:
Right, that's what I'm asking. It seems that the logical thing to do based on the specs is to write a mindless wrapper class that just calls the real class, and register the wrapper in RMI.
This is what I explained I did, but I wondered if other people made the same pointless wrapper class or if everyone else did it differently.
No thats the right approach you can't have network functionality without some form of an adapter class due to the nature of the DB interface. Although since it has a purpose it's not really pointless after all.