posted 23 years ago
If the source says A is true, I would say it is badly worded. Taken as it is, I would say it's wrong: There is no such thing as a nested top-level inner class. It's either an inner class or a top-level class, not both.
You can, however, define a class as a member of an interface and the effect is the same as declaring a top-level class.
Check out the difference between the way you'd instantiate a class defined in an interface and the way you'd instantiate a true inner class:
[ February 01, 2002: Message edited by: Junilu Lacar ]