• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Ron McLeod
  • Paul Clapham
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Liutauras Vilda
Sheriffs:
  • Rob Spoor
  • Bear Bibeault
  • Tim Cooke
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Moores
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
  • Piet Souris
Bartenders:
  • Frits Walraven
  • Himai Minh

Experiences with dynamically typed languages on large projects

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 1209
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Please post them. I'm an average programmer that needs static typing and a helping hand from the compiler and I know that there are tons of others too. From my minimal experience with python on last project (what else but for data crunching ), I felt that these languages demand quite a bit of discipline from developers. I have a feeling that it might work in a small team in a cubicle. But beyond that I'm a little skeptical. Please post your thoughts.

Ruby is the rival
 
This looks like a job for .... legal tender! It says so right in this tiny ad:
Thread Boost feature
https://coderanch.com/t/674455/Thread-Boost-feature
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic