• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Tim Cooke
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • paul wheaton
  • Ron McLeod
  • Devaka Cooray
Sheriffs:
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • Paul Clapham
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
  • Piet Souris
Bartenders:

[JPA - Hibernate] OneToMany without join table

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 15304
6
Mac OS X IntelliJ IDE Chrome
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I have 2 Objects for this question.

Color.java
--id
--name
--description

--@OneToMany
private List<ProductAttributes> attributes;

ProductAttributes.java
--id
--Color color

JPA is generating the Color and ProductAttributes tables but also it is creating a Color_ProductAttributes table. This table doesn't really need to be there, I don't think. So questions:

1. How to set up the annotations so that this table is not created
2. Will it perform better with/without the join table?
 
Gregg Bolinger
Ranch Hand
Posts: 15304
6
Mac OS X IntelliJ IDE Chrome
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Found my solution here.

Thanks.
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 425
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
What if you want to make it as unidirectional without a join table.

Thanks,
Rahul
 
author and cow tipper
Posts: 5009
1
Hibernate Spring Tomcat Server
  • Likes 1
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Indeed, this is actually the default behavior for one to many associations, although it seems a bit weird when a simple foreign key would do.

I've got a simple "Team has many Players" mapping on my website that uses a database like this:




Mapping Many to One and One to Many Associations without a join table

The code is pretty straight forward:







Mapping Many to One and One to Many Associations without a join table

That Join Column annotation is really what does the trick.

-Cameron McKenzie
 
Gregg Bolinger
Ranch Hand
Posts: 15304
6
Mac OS X IntelliJ IDE Chrome
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Cameron,

If you had read the thread you would know that I already stated that I found the solution and linked to the very same page you are linking to.
 
Don't get me started about those stupid light bulbs.
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic