• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
  • Tim Cooke
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Ron McLeod
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • Rob Spoor
  • Junilu Lacar
  • paul wheaton
Saloon Keepers:
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Moores
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
  • Scott Selikoff
  • Piet Souris
  • Jj Roberts
  • fred rosenberger

How does picoJava-II interact with the JVM and OS?

Posts: 7
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

I have a problem understanding how a system based on picoJava-II (picoJava, respectively) works in detail. I think it's easy to answer/confirm for someone who has already worked with picoJava.

Let's assume a typical systems which consists of the picoJava-II core (embedded in hardware of course), an OS, a VM and a java application:

Let's begin: :-)
The JVM and OS are written in C (or C++) and compiled to java (extended) bytecode with a C++2Bytecode compiler (e.g. Metaware).
Is this right so far?

If the java application wants to create a new object the VM allocates memory from the OS (how does it call the OS? Via an extended bytecode?). The OS then calls an extended bytecode instruction which is trapped by picoJava who jumps to and executes the adequate subroutine. Is this right so far? (To which software does the subroutines of the extended bytecode belong to?)

If you can just confirm this or correct me, it would give me great pleasure. :-)

Thank you very much in advance!
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic