• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Tim Cooke
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Ron McLeod
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
Sheriffs:
  • Junilu Lacar
  • Rob Spoor
  • Paul Clapham
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Holloway
  • Tim Moores
  • Jesse Silverman
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Carey Brown
Bartenders:
  • Al Hobbs
  • Piet Souris
  • Frits Walraven

casting question

 
Greenhorn
Posts: 23
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
with this code:
class Alpha {}
class Beta extends Alpha {}
class Chi extends Alpha {}
public class CastTest {
public static void main(String [] args) {
Alpha a = new Alpha();
Beta b = new Beta();
Chi c = new Chi();
a=b;
//b=c; //need explicit cast
b = (Beta)a; //should be OK to downcast
//b = (Beta)c; //can't cast to sibling classes
//c = (Alpha)c; //same as saying c=a
}
}
This is what I think:
1)[ a=b ] will work because b is a subclass of a so its implicitly cast.
2)[ b=c ] needs explicit cast since its a downcast (compile error)
3) [ b = (Beta)a] should be ok since it is explicitly downcasted (no runtime error for me)
4) [ b = (Beta)c ] can't cast to sibling classes (compile error)
5) [ c = (Alpha)c] same as 2.. can't make c=a since that is a downcast
So it looks like 1 and 3 will compile and run.
And 2,4,5 are all compile time errors. Is this correct?
Henry
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 348
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Henry,
for 2, even with explict cast, you will stay have a compiler error. Everything else seems correct.

Originally posted by henry wu:
with this code:
class Alpha {}
class Beta extends Alpha {}
class Chi extends Alpha {}
public class CastTest {
public static void main(String [] args) {
Alpha a = new Alpha();
Beta b = new Beta();
Chi c = new Chi();
a=b;
//b=c; //need explicit cast
b = (Beta)a; //should be OK to downcast
//b = (Beta)c; //can't cast to sibling classes
//c = (Alpha)c; //same as saying c=a
}
}
This is what I think:
1)[ a=b ] will work because b is a subclass of a so its implicitly cast.
2)[ b=c ] needs explicit cast since its a downcast (compile error)
3) [ b = (Beta)a] should be ok since it is explicitly downcasted (no runtime error for me)
4) [ b = (Beta)c ] can't cast to sibling classes (compile error)
5) [ c = (Alpha)c] same as 2.. can't make c=a since that is a downcast
So it looks like 1 and 3 will compile and run.
And 2,4,5 are all compile time errors. Is this correct?
Henry

 
henry wu
Greenhorn
Posts: 23
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
You're right.. I meant it to be b=a instead of b=c.
 
Greenhorn
Posts: 3
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
At line , there is no run time exception throwed, because you have called , then variable a actually refer to the object refered by b.
[ March 12, 2002: Message edited by: Eric Cao ]
 
WHAT is your favorite color? Blue, no yellow, ahhhhhhh! Tiny ad:
Building a Better World in your Backyard by Paul Wheaton and Shawn Klassen-Koop
https://coderanch.com/wiki/718759/books/Building-World-Backyard-Paul-Wheaton
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic