• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Tim Cooke
  • paul wheaton
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Ron McLeod
Sheriffs:
  • Paul Clapham
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • Devaka Cooray
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Holloway
  • Roland Mueller
Bartenders:

Thread

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 247
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Dear all,
Question n�19 from Dan's (third part) devoted to threads:

Answer for possible outputs:


Prints: [T1,A][T2,B].
c. Prints: [T1,B][T2,B].
d. Prints: [T2,B][T1,A].
e. Prints: [T2,A][T1,A].
Since method m1 is not synchronized


As far as I understand, here the modifier static for object b in class A is very important: it means that the same object B is shared between the two threads a and b.
But if we delete this keyword in the code, now each thread has its own object b, and there is no more reason that we obtain a different result than

[T1,A][T2,B]


I've tested it, and on my computer, that's indeed the case.
But may we generalize?
Thanks in advance for your answer,
Cyril.
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 120
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
If you remove the static keyword, indeed there are two diffeerent instances of B created. This garantees that you can not get output like:
[T1,B]
or [T2,A]
However you will not have garantee that the output is always: [T1,A][T2,B]. It can be [T2,B] [T1,A] as well, since no control (garantee) how thread scheduler will do things.
Miki
 
cyril vidal
Ranch Hand
Posts: 247
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
That's right!
Thanks Miki for your answer.
 
You'll never get away with this you overconfident blob! The most you will ever get is this tiny ad:
Smokeless wood heat with a rocket mass heater
https://woodheat.net
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic