• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • Bear Bibeault
  • Junilu Lacar
  • Martin Vashko
Sheriffs:
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Tim Cooke
  • Knute Snortum
Saloon Keepers:
  • Ron McLeod
  • Tim Moores
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
Bartenders:
  • Scott Selikoff
  • salvin francis
  • Piet Souris

When you are beaten to the post.

 
pie sneak
Posts: 4727
Mac VI Editor Ruby
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
You've just spent five or ten minutes typing up an answer to someone's question here at the ranch. You click the button to submit and wait for the thread to display with your new post. Much to your surprise, someone else has already submitted an answer and it looks a lot like yours.

At this point I am usually thinking, "Do I Edit my post so it acknowledges that I agree with the other person, that I'm NOT trying to correct them?" I do not want to confuse the person who asked the question and I do not want to devalue the contribution of the one who answered before me.

What's the proper thing to do?

I can't help but think of the cliche movie scenario:
Guy phones girl and has to leave a message on her answering machine but the machine cuts him off in mid-sentence. Is it worth calling again? In the movies, the guy calls over and over again and ends up looking like more of a buffoon than before.
 
Wanderer
Posts: 18671
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I would usually edit my post to add something like

[I wrote this before I saw Marc's post above, which I agree with.]

at the beginning of the post. Also when looking at other people's posts, if two posts seem to be saying the same thing but not ankowledging each others' existence, I note the post times. If they are close I just assume the second poster hadn't seen the first one.
 
Marc Peabody
pie sneak
Posts: 4727
Mac VI Editor Ruby
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Originally posted by Jim Yingst:
If they are close I just assume the second poster hadn't seen the first one.



As do I, but the person asking the question might not know to check the times. As the "second poster" I shouldn't assume that the thread creator will make such an assumption - unless of course the thread creator has, oh, 12000 or so posts to his or her name.

Thanks for the suggestion of "[I wrote this before...]"
I'll use that.
 
author and iconoclast
Posts: 24203
43
Mac OS X Eclipse IDE Chrome
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I agree with Jim.

I have a pet peeve that I think I'll bring up, though: don't you hate when you answer a question, then note a few days later that the thread is active again so you have a look, and find that some one, after a delay of days, has posted an answer that duplicates yours (or, worse, is similar to yours, but leaves out important details, or includes some critical mistake?) I'd love to know what motivates those folks.
 
lowercase baba
Posts: 12773
51
Chrome Java Linux
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I'm convinced that some people read the original post, don't bother reading all the crap that's been posted since then, and just answer the OP question.

I mean, really, why should i read what everybody ELSE wrote, when I know the answer?
 
Sheriff
Posts: 13411
Firefox Browser VI Editor Redhat
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
If I'm going to take the time to answer the question, I'm certainly going spend a few minutes skiming the existing ones. For me, anyway, the former takes a lot longer than than the latter.
 
drifter
Posts: 1364
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I hate it when the other post was submitted 10 minutes before mine and is so much more elegantly worded.

 
Ben Souther
Sheriff
Posts: 13411
Firefox Browser VI Editor Redhat
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I hate when someone posts like 10 minutes before me and says it more better.
[ March 24, 2005: Message edited by: Ben Souther ]
 
Ernest Friedman-Hill
author and iconoclast
Posts: 24203
43
Mac OS X Eclipse IDE Chrome
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I don't like when somebody posts a whole buncha hours after me and posts more worser.
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 884
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
As a thread starter, you'd hate it if no one post any reply after 10 days.
 
These are the worst of times and these are the best of times. And this is the best tiny ad:
Java file APIs (DOC, XLS, PDF, and many more)
https://products.aspose.com/total/java
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
Boost this thread!