Last week, we had the author of TDD for a Shopping Website LiveProject. Friday at 11am Ranch time, Steven Solomon will be hosting a live TDD session just for us. See for the agenda and registration link
Last week, we had the author of TDD for a Shopping Website LiveProject. Friday at 11am Ranch time, Steven Solomon will be hosting a live TDD session just for us. See for the agenda and registration link
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Paul Clapham
  • Ron McLeod
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Tim Cooke
Sheriffs:
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • paul wheaton
  • Henry Wong
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Moores
  • Tim Holloway
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Carey Brown
  • Frits Walraven
Bartenders:
  • Piet Souris
  • Himai Minh

Doubt in S&B book - Inner classes

 
Greenhorn
Posts: 17
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Ref. page 642

From outside the outer class instance code (including static method code
within the outer class)
, the inner class name must now include the outer
class's name:
MyOuter.MyInner

(emphasis mine)

However, this doesn't seem to be accurate. For instance, this code compiles and runs (under a 1.4 compiler, albeit, as I don't have access to a 1.5 one currently):


class MyOuter {
class MyInner {
private int x = 5;
int getX() { return x; }
}

public static void main(String [] args) {
MyOuter out = new MyOuter();
MyInner m = out.new MyInner(); // not MyOuter.MyInner

System.out.println(m.getX());
}
}

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 329
Oracle Java Linux
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
It compiles fine under java 1.5.

The only problem would come when trying to create an instance of the inner class: you'll need to explicitly use an instance of the outer class.

The following: MyInner m = new MyInner()

- Will work inside a non static method. It is interpreted as: MyInner m = this.new MyInner()
- Will not work in a static context.
 
Adam Schweitzer
Greenhorn
Posts: 17
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Originally posted by Sergio Tridente:
It compiles fine under java 1.5.

The only problem would come when trying to create an instance of the inner class: you'll need to explicitly use an instance of the outer class.

The following: MyInner m = new MyInner()

- Will work inside a non static method. It is interpreted as: MyInner m = this.new MyInner()
- Will not work in a static context.


Yup, that's all true..

It just seemed odd to me that the book said static methods in the same class as the inner class had to use the MyOuter.MyInner syntax, because MyInner should still be in the symbol table (or Javac's equivalent) and hence visible to the static method.

I believe this is an error in the book, and it's not in the "errata" post.
 
I suggest huckleberry pie. But the only thing on the gluten free menu is this tiny ad:
free, earth-friendly heat - a kickstarter for putting coin in your pocket while saving the earth
https://coderanch.com/t/751654/free-earth-friendly-heat-kickstarter
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic