Has-a relationship
Yeming Hu
Ranch Hand
Posts: 37
posted 10 years ago
In K&B book,P158, self test 1):
A Has-a relationships always rely on inheritance.
B Has-a relationships always rely on instance variables.
C Has-a relationships always require at least two class type.
D Has-a relations always rely on polymorphism.
E Has-a relationship are always tightly coupled.
The given answer is B and I can tell others are obviously wrong.
However, In K&B bonus master exam, we have the following question:
A Has-a relationships are, by definition, well encapsulated.
B A covariant return requires the existence of a has-a relationship.
C Overriding requires the existence of a is-a relationship.
D In some cases, is-a relationships are used in the process of autoboxing.
E Has-a relationships are always defined with instance variables.
The given answer is C&&D. According to the self test question, I think E is also the right answer. The explanation is that class (static) variables can also be used to define has-a relationships.
Therefore, I think these two question are contradictory to one another. Could anyone help me clear this?
A Has-a relationships always rely on inheritance.
B Has-a relationships always rely on instance variables.
C Has-a relationships always require at least two class type.
D Has-a relations always rely on polymorphism.
E Has-a relationship are always tightly coupled.
The given answer is B and I can tell others are obviously wrong.
However, In K&B bonus master exam, we have the following question:
A Has-a relationships are, by definition, well encapsulated.
B A covariant return requires the existence of a has-a relationship.
C Overriding requires the existence of a is-a relationship.
D In some cases, is-a relationships are used in the process of autoboxing.
E Has-a relationships are always defined with instance variables.
The given answer is C&&D. According to the self test question, I think E is also the right answer. The explanation is that class (static) variables can also be used to define has-a relationships.
Therefore, I think these two question are contradictory to one another. Could anyone help me clear this?
Best Wishes,<br /> Yeming
Paul Napauleon
Greenhorn
Posts: 15
Yeming Hu
Ranch Hand
Posts: 37
posted 10 years ago
It seems so, so what about the first question? There should be no answer for it
Originally posted by Paul van den Berg:
A HAS-A relationship can also be accomplished by a static variable right?
It seems so, so what about the first question? There should be no answer for it
Best Wishes,<br /> Yeming
posted 10 years ago
I agree. I don't see p. 158 listed in the K&B Errata page, but my understanding is that static fields constitute a HAS-A relationship.
Originally posted by Yeming Hu:
... Therefore, I think these two question are contradictory to one another...
I agree. I don't see p. 158 listed in the K&B Errata page, but my understanding is that static fields constitute a HAS-A relationship.
"We're kind of on the level of crossword puzzle writers... And no one ever goes to them and gives them an award." ~Joe Strummer
sscce.org
Noam Wolf
Greenhorn
Posts: 12
posted 10 years ago
Well I agree with you guys but it raises a different question in my mind... which one of the answers are wrong?
Notice that solution E states:
Has-a relationships are always defined with instance variables.
Can a "Has-a" relationships be defined with a static variable?
If class Animal has a static variable of type Collar, and class Dog extends Animal, wouldn't class Dog "has-a" Collar too?
I'm confused regarding the working here... is a static variable considered an instance variable? I don't think so... sun reference but now i'm not quite sure....
Notice that solution E states:
Has-a relationships are always defined with instance variables.
Can a "Has-a" relationships be defined with a static variable?
If class Animal has a static variable of type Collar, and class Dog extends Animal, wouldn't class Dog "has-a" Collar too?
I'm confused regarding the working here... is a static variable considered an instance variable? I don't think so... sun reference but now i'm not quite sure....
dhwani mathur
Ranch Hand
Posts: 621
posted 10 years ago
well!!may i be am not correct but
what i think is since static variables and methods are not attached to the instance of class using class object we cannot access static methods or variables......but using the class name we can access static methods or variables may be bcoz of this it is mentioned,HAS a relationship can be defined using static variables of class.
Although
what actualy is that
HAS-a relationship is defined using instance variables of class.....i too thought E also should be the answer.......
i hope it helps........
what i think is since static variables and methods are not attached to the instance of class using class object we cannot access static methods or variables......but using the class name we can access static methods or variables may be bcoz of this it is mentioned,HAS a relationship can be defined using static variables of class.
Although
what actualy is that
HAS-a relationship is defined using instance variables of class.....i too thought E also should be the answer.......
i hope it helps........
