• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Tim Cooke
  • Devaka Cooray
  • Ron McLeod
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
Sheriffs:
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • paul wheaton
  • Junilu Lacar
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Moores
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Piet Souris
  • Carey Brown
  • Tim Holloway
Bartenders:
  • Martijn Verburg
  • Frits Walraven
  • Himai Minh

K&B SCJP 5...Chap2..Que 7

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 72
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi

I could not understand the explaination that the book gives for the answer.It a drag and drop question and goes like this:

Code:
class AgedP {
__________ __________ __________ __________ __________
public AgedP(int x) {
__________ __________ __________ __________ __________
}
}
public class Kinder extends AgedP {
__________ __________ __________ _________ ________ __________
Self Test Answers 167
168 Chapter 2: Object Orientation
public Kinder(int x) {
__________ __________ __________ __________ __________ ();
}
}
Fragments: Use the following fragments zero or more times:
AgedP super this
( ) { }
;

======
Answer:
class AgedP {
AgedP() {}
public AgedP(int x) {
}
}
public class Kinder extends AgedP {
public Kinder(int x) {
super();
}
}
As there is no droppable tile for the variable x and the parentheses (in the Kinder constructor),
are already in place and empty, there is no way to construct a call to the superclass constructor
that takes an argument. Therefore, the only remaining possibility is to create a call to the no-argument
superclass constructor. This is done as: super();. The line cannot be left blank, as the
parentheses are already in place. Further, since the superclass constructor called is the no-argument
version, this constructor must be created. It will not be created by the compiler because
there is another constructor already present.


=======================
"As there is no droppable tile for the variable x and the parentheses (in the Kinder constructor),
are already in place and empty, there is no way to construct a call to the superclass constructor
that takes an argument."


what does the above sentence trying too say.

Please help.
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 383
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Description is tryiing to say, "Kinder constructor has ()(non-argumented call). this() cannot goes there because there is no other constructor in Kinder class. So non-argumented super() must goes there.
 
raghu dubey
Ranch Hand
Posts: 72
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Now I see whats is happening.

Thanks
 
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic