• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Tim Cooke
  • Ron McLeod
  • paul wheaton
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
Sheriffs:
  • Paul Clapham
  • Devaka Cooray
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Holloway
  • Roland Mueller
  • Himai Minh
Bartenders:

WebLogic Connection Pools and VARRY

 
Greenhorn
Posts: 9
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
We are using weblogic JDBC connection pools in a clustered environment. The stored procs are taking VARRAY's as parms. There seems to be an issue with BEA 7.0 spk2 and earlier - according to our vendors who are working on the project, there seem to be issues with the binding of VARRAY types with WLS drivers.

The question is:
1. Could we use Table/ Tablesets instead of VARRAYs?
2. What are the issues with BEA (7.0 spk2) and VARRAYs?
Any comments/ suggestions?
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 925
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
use drivers from the DB vendor maybe?
 
NikhilN Kumar
Greenhorn
Posts: 9
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
We are using the Oracle thin driver. The issue is that the Oracle connection pools do not serialize and do not cluster. WebLogic connection pools do, but they do not seem to work with VARRAYs. Which is why we are looking for another best practice/ recommendation.
What are the options that we have??
 
Don't get me started about those stupid light bulbs.
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic