For Solveig - EJB 3.0

[Pradeep bhatt]

Hi Solveig ,

EJB 3.0 will be defining a light weight model based on POJO. What is your opinion on the new version of EJB.

Thanks.

[Nicholas Cheung]

Sorry for asking, could you breifly explain to me what is POJO?

Thanks.

Nick

[sunitha reghu]

Plain old java object ?
When I googled it this what i got

[Nicholas Cheung]

I have tried search this before, but I am a bit cant believe it.

Plain Old Java Object?!~~~ How come new EJB spec will use old stuffs... If in such case, it just simply like what the old JavaBean idea!!! This is my first feeling.

JavaBean is just used to hold data, with a less, or even no business logic!

I am not familiar with EJB 3.0, thus, maybe there are some magic that wrap the POJO, and provide the business logic!

Nick

[Alan Ford]

I think they finaly smarten up. What is wrong with simple?

[Solveig Laura Haugland]

Originally posted by Pradeep Bhat:
Hi Solveig ,

EJB 3.0 will be defining a light weight model based on POJO. What is your opinion on the new version of EJB.

Thanks.

Hi,

I don't know anything about EJB 3.0; I've pinged my distinguished coauthors to take a look at that question. The book is the big picture for J2EE 1.4 and related specs. But hey, lightweight sounds good.

Solveig

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[e-mail]
www.bigpicture-books.com

"J2EE: The Big Picture" by Solveig Haugland, Mark Cade, and Anthony Orapallo
Knowledge without coding.
Understanding without boredom.
And occasional references to badgers.

[Pradeep bhatt]

such case, it just simply like what the old JavaBean idea!!!

Yes it is. You dont even need to import javax.ejb.* classes.