• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
  • Tim Cooke
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Ron McLeod
  • Junilu Lacar
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • Paul Clapham
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Henry Wong
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Moores
  • Tim Holloway
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Piet Souris
  • Carey Brown
  • Jesse Duncan
  • Frits Walraven
  • Mikalai Zaikin

complex mappings in EJB3

Ranch Hand
Posts: 567
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Just looking thro the table of contents of the EJB3 Persistence book, I couldn't tell whether it covers many-to-many join tables, or other more complicated entity relationships.

I have worked with legacy databases on the last 2 projects I did, and with Hibernate I had a few problems mapping the tables to a reasonable domain model. For example, I effectively had a one-to-one relationship to model, but in the DB it was a parent-child entity relationship, and I had to map a left-join from the child to the parent. Hibernate couldn't do it.

How much would you say EJB3 provides for doing this sort of thing?
Posts: 304
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi Adam,

The book does discuss the more advanced mappings in the spec, although many-to-many join tables are not considered advanced but are in chapter 4, which is the basic O/R mapping chapter.

The first version of the spec covers some of the more common mappings, and also some exotic ones, but admittedly there will be some that are not fully specified. Some aspects of parent-child relationships are available through cascading. Explicit queries support left joins, but the spec does not specify exactly how a vendor must query for related objects if joining is not requested or for internal object loading. This would currently be a feature in vendor-add land.

    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic