• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Ron McLeod
  • Paul Clapham
  • Liutauras Vilda
Sheriffs:
  • paul wheaton
  • Rob Spoor
  • Devaka Cooray
Saloon Keepers:
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
  • Frits Walraven
  • Tim Moores
Bartenders:
  • Mikalai Zaikin

How Seam beats Grails ?

 
clojure forum advocate
Posts: 3479
Mac Objective C Clojure
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi Michael.
I have been reading your weblog: Are Rails and Grails Scalable?.
How Seam beats Grails ?
I got to feel : JSF == poor performance , since JSF components are created on the server, their state should be saved some where (client or server).
Thanks for your time.
 
author
Posts: 1436
6
Python TypeScript Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
JSF is certainly slower than Struts -- but I do not think the overhead JSF adds is that important in the grand scheme of things. With a dual core machine, I can easily drive a JSF+Seam+EJB3+DB application to more than 200 transactions per second -- that is much faster than most developers ever need. In the real world, the performance bottleneck is probably from other layers of the app.

Re Grails: I think you do pay a price in performance for using those cute "dynamic languages" BTW, Seam 1.3 will provide Groovy integration as well. So, you can much of the same things as Grails in Seam!
 
Hussein Baghdadi
clojure forum advocate
Posts: 3479
Mac Objective C Clojure
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Re Grails: I think you do pay a price in performance for using those cute "dynamic languages"


But Groovy code is byte code after all, right ?
 
It's exactly the same and completely different as this tiny ad:
a bit of art, as a gift, that will fit in a stocking
https://gardener-gift.com
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic