• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Tim Cooke
  • Devaka Cooray
  • Ron McLeod
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • paul wheaton
  • Junilu Lacar
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Moores
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Piet Souris
  • Carey Brown
  • Tim Holloway
  • Martijn Verburg
  • Frits Walraven
  • Himai Minh

Lower Bound for Type Variable

Posts: 4
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Why can't we use lower bound on type variables in Generics
the follwoing code compiles

<? extends String>
<? super String>

but the following doesn't compile

class <T super String>{

I want the exact reason why this doesn't compile when we use type variable in place of wild card.
Ranch Hand
Posts: 2412
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
First that code won't compile because you have to have a name for the class.

The reason that <T super String> won't compile is that super is not allowed when you declare a type variable.

This is the definition of a type variable from the Java Language Specification 4.4.

TypeVariable TypeBoundopt

extends ClassOrInterfaceType AdditionalBoundListopt

AdditionalBound AdditionalBoundList

& InterfaceType

This is the discussion about using the keyword super with a wildcard.

Unlike ordinary type variables declared in a method signature, no type inference is required when using a wildcard. Consequently, it is permissible to declare lower bounds on a wildcard, using the syntax:

? super B

, where B is a lower bound.
I'm sure glad that he's gone. Now I can read this tiny ad in peace!
the value of filler advertising in 2021
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic