This week's book giveaway is in the Spring forum.
We're giving away four copies of Spring in Action (5th edition) and have Craig Walls on-line!
See this thread for details.
Win a copy of Spring in Action (5th edition) this week in the Spring forum!
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Bear Bibeault
  • Devaka Cooray
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Knute Snortum
  • Junilu Lacar
  • paul wheaton
Saloon Keepers:
  • Ganesh Patekar
  • Frits Walraven
  • Tim Moores
  • Ron McLeod
  • Carey Brown
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • salvin francis
  • Tim Holloway

JTable(Vector param1, Vector param2)  RSS feed

Ranch Hand
Posts: 15304
Chrome IntelliJ IDE Mac OS X
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Recently I have learned that an ArrayList is acually better than a Vector because it is faster. Does anyone know why Sun would not have included a method in there JTable to accept ArrayLists as parameters?
Ranch Hand
Posts: 732
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
good question
maybe because of backward compatibality.....
anyway it is very annoying to use the Vectors when constructing a JTable and i agree with you.
Ranch Hand
Posts: 508
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Vector is synchronized while ArrayList is initially not. If they would accept an ArrayList as argument they would have to make sure that it's synchronized. Not, that this is a big problem.
I think they just didn't change the implementation of DefaultTableModel which uses Vector though they are propagating the use of ArrayList to everyone else.
Anyway, as Vector is a subtype of collection it's not that difficult to use ArrayLists and initialize a JTable using a vector, nonetheless:
ArrayList data = new ArrayList();
JTable table = new JTable(new Vector(data));
Another possibility is to create your own TableModel which uses a synchronized ArrayList or HashMap or whatever is the most efficient container in this case.
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
Boost this thread!